Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Software RFP Template

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Software RFP Template
Preview Download Ms Word Template
5/5
16 pages
48 downloads
Updated January 10, 2025

This Request for Proposal (RFP) seeks a comprehensive Breach and Attack Simulation solution that continuously validates security controls through automated attack simulations.

The solution must enable organizations to proactively identify vulnerabilities, test security measures, and improve incident response capabilities while providing actionable insights for security enhancement.

Key Functional Requirements

  • Core Capabilities
  • Attack Vectors
  • Security Controls
  • Advanced Features
  • Reporting & Analytics

More Templates

Most Downloaded
Service Mesh Tools RFP Template

Service Mesh Tools RFP Template

Provides a structured framework for evaluating vendors and solutions that can manage service-to-service communication in microservices architectures, with specific focus on security, observability, traffic management, and AI-enhanced capabilities.
View Template
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform RFP Template

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform RFP Template

Outlines technical specifications, evaluation criteria, and implementation requirements for vendors to provide unified, secure access services that support modern distributed enterprises.
View Template
SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) Solutions RFP Template

SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) Solutions RFP Template

Details technical specifications, evaluation criteria, and implementation requirements for vendors to deliver a robust security solution that protects SaaS environments while ensuring regulatory compliance and operational efficiency.
View Template

Request for Proposal: Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) Software Solution

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction and Background
  2. Project Objectives
  3. Scope of Work
  4. Technical Requirements
  5. Functional Requirements
  6. Vendor Qualifications
  7. Evaluation Criteria
  8. Submission Guidelines
  9. Timeline and Process
  10. Contact Information

1. Introduction and Background

Our organization seeks proposals for a comprehensive Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) software solution to enhance our cybersecurity testing and validation capabilities. We require a robust system that continuously tests our security controls through automated attack simulations and provides actionable insights for improvement.

Current Environment

We maintain a complex cybersecurity infrastructure that includes:

  • Network security controls (firewalls, IDS/IPS)
  • Endpoint protection platforms
  • Email security solutions
  • Cloud security tools
  • Security information and event management (SIEM) system
  • Security orchestration and automated response (SOAR) platform

Business Drivers

  • Need for continuous security validation
  • Requirement to test against emerging threats
  • Compliance with industry regulations
  • Resource optimization for security testing
  • Improved security ROI measurement

2. Project Objectives

The primary objectives for implementing a BAS solution are:

Enhance Security Validation

  • Implement continuous testing of security controls
  • Validate effectiveness of existing security investments
  • Identify security gaps before they can be exploited

Improve Response Capabilities

  • Enable realistic attack scenario testing
  • Strengthen incident response procedures
  • Validate detection and prevention capabilities

Support Compliance Requirements

  • Demonstrate security control effectiveness
  • Generate compliance-ready reports
  • Maintain audit trail of security testing

Optimize Security Resources

  • Automate routine security testing
  • Prioritize remediation efforts
  • Provide clear metrics for security improvements

3. Scope of Work

The selected vendor will be responsible for:

Software Implementation

  • Installation and configuration of BAS platform
  • Integration with existing security tools
  • Configuration of initial attack scenarios
  • Setup of reporting and dashboards

Knowledge Transfer

  • Administrator training
  • Security team training
  • Documentation delivery
  • Best practices guidance

Ongoing Support

  • Technical support
  • Platform updates
  • Threat intelligence updates
  • Regular health checks

4. Technical Requirements

4.1 Platform Requirements

Deployment Options

  • Support for cloud-based deployment
  • On-premises deployment capability
  • Hybrid deployment support
  • Multi-site deployment support

System Requirements

  • Minimum server specifications
  • Network bandwidth requirements
  • Storage requirements
  • Database requirements

Security Requirements

  • Encryption for data at rest
  • Encryption for data in transit
  • Role-based access control
  • Multi-factor authentication
  • Audit logging

4.2 Integration Requirements

Required Integrations

  • SIEM integration
  • SOAR platform integration
  • Vulnerability scanner integration
  • Ticket system integration
  • Active Directory/LDAP integration

API Requirements

  • RESTful API availability
  • API documentation
  • Custom integration support
  • Webhook support

5. Functional Requirements

5.1 Attack Simulation Capabilities

Tip: Attack simulation capabilities form the core of any BAS solution. Focus on breadth of coverage across different attack vectors and the ability to safely execute these simulations without impacting production environments. Ensure the solution provides both depth and safety in testing.

Category Requirement Y/N Notes
Core Simulation Engine – Framework Alignment Full MITRE ATT&CK framework coverage
Custom framework support
Mapping of techniques to security controls
Real-time framework updates
Technique chaining capabilities
Core Simulation Engine – Execution Control Granular simulation controls
Real-time execution monitoring
Kill-switch functionality
Rollback capabilities
Simulation scheduling
Concurrent execution support
Core Simulation Engine – Environment Protection Sandboxing capabilities
Production safeguards
Resource throttling
Impact analysis
Environmental checks
Recovery procedures
Network Attack Simulation Lateral movement techniques
Network protocol attacks
Man-in-the-middle scenarios
DNS attack simulation
Network tunneling detection
Data exfiltration scenarios
Command and control simulation
Network segmentation testing
Zero-day exploit simulation
Custom payload support
Endpoint Attack Simulation Process injection techniques
Memory manipulation
Credential theft simulation
Registry manipulation
File system attacks
Driver manipulation
Boot sector attacks
PowerShell attack simulation
Living-off-the-land techniques
Fileless malware simulation
Email Security Testing Spear-phishing campaigns
Business email compromise
Malicious attachment simulation
URL-based attacks
Social engineering scenarios
Newsletter subscription abuse
Email spoofing detection
DMARC/DKIM/SPF testing
Email gateway validation
User awareness metrics
Web Application Testing SQL injection patterns
Cross-site scripting (XSS)
CSRF attacks
Authentication bypass
Session hijacking
API security testing
Web service attacks
Cookie manipulation
Input validation testing
Business logic abuse
Cloud Security Testing Cloud misconfigurations
Identity access testing
Storage security validation
Serverless function testing
Container security
Cloud service enumeration
Resource exposure testing
Cross-account attacks
Cloud API abuse
Service integration testing

5.2 Control Validation Framework

Tip: Control validation is crucial for measuring defense effectiveness. Ensure the solution can test across the full spectrum of security controls – from prevention through detection to response – while providing clear metrics for control effectiveness and failure points.

Category Requirement Y/N Notes
Prevention Controls Firewall rule validation
IPS signature testing
Anti-malware effectiveness
Web filtering accuracy
DLP policy validation
Access control testing
Encryption verification
Network segmentation
Application whitelisting
Device control validation
Detection Controls SIEM rule validation
Alert generation testing
Log collection verification
Correlation rule testing
Threat hunting scenario support
Behavioral detection
Anomaly detection
Indicator matching
Custom detection rules
False positive analysis
Response Controls Incident response workflow
Automated response testing
Containment effectiveness
Eradication procedures
Recovery validation
Playbook execution
Team notification testing
Escalation procedures
Integration testing
SLA compliance validation

5.3 Reporting and Analytics

Tip: Comprehensive reporting capabilities are essential for demonstrating security posture improvements and compliance. Focus on solutions that offer flexible reporting options that can serve both technical and business stakeholders while supporting compliance requirements.

Category Requirement Y/N Notes
Executive Reports Security posture overview
Risk trend analysis
Compliance status
Resource utilization
Cost impact analysis
Remediation progress
Security score cards
Benchmark comparisons
Investment effectiveness
Strategic recommendations
Technical Reports Attack simulation details
Control effectiveness metrics
Failed attack vectors
Successful penetration paths
Configuration gaps
System vulnerabilities
Remediation steps
Technical recommendations
Integration status
Performance metrics
Compliance Reports Regulatory compliance status
Control mapping evidence
Audit trail documentation
Policy compliance
Risk assessment data
Data privacy validation
Industry standard alignment
Custom framework reporting
Continuous monitoring evidence
Compliance gap analysis

5.4 Advanced Features

Tip: Advanced features differentiate leading solutions from basic tools. Prioritize capabilities that leverage machine learning and threat intelligence to provide predictive insights and automated adaptation to emerging threats while supporting enterprise-scale deployments.

Category Requirement Y/N Notes
Intelligence Sources Commercial threat feed integration
Open-source intelligence incorporation
Industry-specific threat data
Government advisory integration
Dark web monitoring
Zero-day vulnerability tracking
APT group behavior patterns
Malware family analysis
Campaign tracking
Indicator sharing platforms
Machine Learning Capabilities Dynamic attack path generation
Behavior-based scenario creation
Pattern recognition
Anomaly detection
Risk prediction
Attack success probability
Control effectiveness learning
Environmental adaptation
Resource optimization
Performance tuning
Multi-tenancy Support Isolated tenant environments
Tenant-specific configurations
Resource allocation control
Cross-tenant reporting
Consolidated administration
Tenant templating
Migration capabilities
Backup per tenant
Custom branding
Tenant health monitoring
Performance Management CPU utilization control
Memory optimization
Storage efficiency
Network bandwidth management
Database performance
Cache optimization
Thread management
Queue handling
Background processing
Resource scheduling

6. Vendor Qualifications

Vendors must demonstrate:

Market Position

  • Minimum 5 years in cybersecurity
  • Established BAS market presence
  • Strong financial stability
  • Positive industry recognition

Technical Expertise

  • Security certification maintenance
  • Research and development capability
  • Regular platform updates
  • Innovation track record

Support Infrastructure

  • 24/7 technical support
  • Professional services capability
  • Training programs
  • Implementation expertise

7. Evaluation Criteria

Proposals will be evaluated on:

Technical Merit (40%)

  • Feature completeness
  • Technical architecture
  • Integration capabilities
  • Performance metrics

Implementation Approach (20%)

  • Methodology
  • Timeline
  • Resource requirements
  • Risk mitigation

Vendor Capability (20%)

  • Experience
  • References
  • Support infrastructure
  • Financial stability

Cost (20%)

  • License costs
  • Implementation costs
  • Maintenance costs
  • Training costs

8. Submission Guidelines

Proposals must include:

Technical Response

  • Solution description
  • Technical specifications
  • Integration approach
  • Implementation plan

Company Information

  • Corporate overview
  • Financial information
  • Client references
  • Team biographies

Support Details

  • Support structure
  • Service level agreements
  • Training programs
  • Maintenance procedures

Pricing Information

  • License costs
  • Implementation costs
  • Support costs
  • Optional features

9. Timeline and Process

  • RFP Release Date: [Date]
  • Questions Deadline: [Date]
  • Proposal Due Date: [Date]
  • Vendor Presentations: [Date Range]
  • Selection Date: [Date]
  • Project Start Date: [Date]

10. Contact Information

Please submit proposals and questions to: [Contact Name] [Email Address] [Phone Number]

Download Ms Word Template