Procurement Documents

Proof of Concept Template (Free, Word): Software POC Plan

A free, vendor-neutral POC template for testing finalists' software with your own data before you choose, with success criteria, test scenarios, data handling, costs, scoring and a go/no-go decision.

14 pages Microsoft Word Updated October 8, 2026
Download Template
Proof of Concept Template (Free, Word): Software POC Plan

Preview the first pages

See the structure before you download. The Word file has every section listed below, ready to fill in.

What's inside

The sections in the document, in order.

  1. Purpose and why a POC
  2. Scope
  3. Success criteria
  4. Test scenarios and results log
  5. Environment and data handling
  6. Roles and responsibilities
  7. Schedule
  8. Costs and who pays
  9. Plan sign-off
  10. Evaluation and scoring (internal)

Use this proof of concept template when you're choosing software and a demo can't prove a requirement that matters, such as an integration with your systems or performance at your volumes. That's step 8 of the RFP process: after scoring the proposals, you test the finalists' software with your own data and scenarios, for a fixed period, against success criteria agreed in writing before the work starts.


It's written for whoever runs the selection, such as a procurement lead or IT manager, and it's also the plan you agree with each finalist. Both sides sign off the scope, success criteria, test data, who provides what, the schedule and who pays before any work begins. Proof of concept can also mean testing your own product or startup idea before you build it, but this template is for buyers testing a vendor's software.


The Word file is a complete POC document you can use as it stands. The first part is the plan you share with the vendor, including a results log. The second part stays with your evaluation team: it turns POC results into updated RFP scores, compares two or three finalists side by side and records the go/no-go decision.


What's inside this template


  • A purpose section listing the requirements a demo couldn't prove, each with its RFP requirement ID
  • Scope: use cases, what's in and out of scope, and ground rules, such as the vendor declaring any custom code or third-party product a scenario needs
  • A success criteria table with how each criterion is measured, a pass threshold placeholder and a must-have or nice-to-have priority, plus example criteria for integration, performance, data loading and single sign-on
  • Test scenarios your own staff run with your own data, plus a results log that records how each result was achieved: standard functionality, configuration, custom work or a third-party product
  • Environment and data handling: test data, masking, security, data deletion at the end, and a table of who provides what
  • Roles for both sides, an example schedule, a costs table that records who pays for what, and sign-off for the plan
  • Internal sections for scoring, a side-by-side comparison of two or three finalists, go/no-go rules, a decision record and next steps

Download the editable Microsoft Word version below. The full text is on this page, so you can read it before you download.

How to use this template

Fill in Sections 1 to 8 before you send the plan to the finalists, agree them with each one, and get Section 9 signed before any work starts. Sections 10 to 13 are for your evaluation team only.

  1. Decide what the POC has to prove. List the requirements the proposals and demos left in doubt, with each one’s ID from the RFP. If a scripted demo, a reference call or a document could settle a requirement, leave it out. Every requirement you add makes the POC longer for both sides.
  2. Write the success criteria and scenarios. For each requirement, write a criterion with how it’s measured, a pass threshold and a priority, then a scenario your own staff will run with your own data. Set the decision rules in Section 12 at the same time. Use the same criteria and scenarios for every finalist.
  3. Agree the terms with each finalist. Settle the environment, test data, security, who provides what, the schedule and the costs with each vendor’s POC lead. Have legal review the plan if the POC is charged, uses real personal data or connects to your systems. Then have both sides sign Section 9.
  4. Run the scenarios and log the results. Have your testers run each scenario and record the result, the evidence and how it was achieved. Log issues as they come up, and give the vendor a short, fixed window to fix and retest, the same for every finalist.
  5. Score, decide and carry the results forward. Update the scores for the RFP criteria the POC tested, at the weights you set before proposals arrived, and compare the finalists side by side. Make the go/no-go decision against the rules you set in advance. Then write what the POC proved into the contract and the statement of work, and get written confirmation that each vendor has deleted your data.

POC vs demo vs pilot

All three let you see software working before you commit, so they’re easy to mix up, and vendors don’t all use the words the same way. Some offer a proof of value (POV), which puts more weight on business results, but the labels are used loosely. Whatever the name, what matters is who runs it, with whose data, and what it can prove.

How they differ:

  • Demo. The vendor shows its product, ideally following your script with your sample data, as the RFP process recommends. It’s a single session, the vendor drives, and it shows what the product can do in the vendor’s hands.
  • Proof of concept. Your own staff test a few specific requirements in a test environment, with your data and test connections to your systems, over a fixed period before you choose. It shows whether the product meets those requirements in your setting.
  • Pilot. Real users do real work in the product, such as one team or site, for a set period. It shows whether the product holds up in day-to-day use and whether to roll it out further. Because real work and often live data are involved, a pilot needs its own commercial and data protection terms.
  • Free trial. Self-service access to the product, with no agreed success criteria. It gives your team a feel for the product, but it can’t settle the requirements a POC is for.

How to write POC success criteria that hold up

Success criteria decide whether a vendor passes, so write them before the POC starts and give every finalist the same ones. A criterion holds up when two evaluators looking at the same evidence would reach the same verdict.

Start from the RFP. If your requirements name the user, the task and the proof, as How to Write an RFP recommends, most of the criteria are already drafted. Then rewrite anything vague, using placeholders until you’ve agreed your own numbers:

  • Weak: “The integration works.” Stronger: “Accounts created or updated in the [ERP] test system appear in [product] within [time] for all [number] test records, field by field, and failed records are logged with a reason.”
  • Weak: “Performance is acceptable.” Stronger: “With [number] records loaded, the [search or report] returns results in [seconds] or less in at least [number] of [number] timed runs, measured by our IT team.”
  • Weak: “Users find it easy.” Stronger: “[Number] of our [role] users complete scenarios TS-1 to TS-3 without vendor help after [length] of training, and rate ease of use [score] or higher on a 1-to-5 scale.”
  • Set the pass threshold before the test. If you set it after the results are in, it’s easy to put it where your preferred vendor passes.
  • Mark each criterion must-have or nice-to-have. A failed must-have means no-go for that vendor, so keep that list short.
  • Record how each result was achieved. A pass that needed custom code or a third-party add-on can bring extra cost and upgrade work that a pass through standard configuration doesn’t.
  • Name who measures each criterion and what counts as evidence, such as a timed run or a reconciliation report. Don’t rely on the vendor’s own report alone.

Who pays for a proof of concept

There’s no fixed rule. Some vendors run a POC at their own cost as part of the sale. Others charge for it, particularly when it needs integration work or their consultants’ time. Ask each finalist early, because the answer can affect how many finalists you can afford to test.

Either way, the POC costs you too: testers’ time, data preparation and masking, a security review, and any test connections your IT team sets up. Budget for them.

Agree these points in writing before the POC starts:

  • The fee, if any, what it covers, and a cap. Nothing beyond the cap without your written approval.
  • Expenses such as travel, and whether they need approval in advance.
  • Whether any fee will be credited against your first-year fees if you sign. You can ask for this.
  • That the POC doesn’t commit you to buy, and that test licenses end on a set date and don’t turn into a paid subscription.
  • Who owns the configuration, scripts and documents created during the POC, and whether they can be reused in the implementation.
  • For a paid POC with a lot of vendor work, a short statement of work for the POC itself.
  • Public-sector buyers: check with your procurement office before accepting a POC at no charge or paying for one, and offer every finalist the same terms.

The full template

This is the complete text of the Word document. Fill in the [bracketed] placeholders and delete the italic guidance before you send it.

1. Purpose and why a POC

Buyer instructions: replace every [bracketed placeholder], delete
anything that doesn’t apply, and delete all italic guidance before you
send this plan. Sections 1 to 9 are the POC plan: make one copy per
finalist, with identical success criteria and scenarios, and have both
sides sign Section 9 before any work starts. Sections 10 to 13 are for
your evaluation team only, so delete them from every vendor’s
copy.

Item Details
RFP reference [RFP number and title]
Buyer [Organization legal name]
Vendor [Vendor legal name]
Product and edition tested [Product, edition and version, as proposed]
POC period [Start date to end date]
Buyer POC lead [Name, title, email]
Vendor POC lead [Name, title, email]
Plan version [Version number and date]

1.1 Purpose

[Organization name] (“we”, “us”) is selecting [type of software]
through [RFP number]. [Vendor name] (“the vendor”) is one of [two /
three] finalists. This proof of concept (POC) tests whether [product]
meets the requirements in Section 1.2 when our own staff use it with our
data, in the environment in Section 5, over the period in Section 7.

The results will update our evaluation of the vendor’s proposal. This
POC does not commit us to buy [product], or either party to enter into a
contract. [The confidentiality terms in the RFP / The non-disclosure
agreement dated [date]] apply to everything shared during the POC.

1.2 Requirements a demo
couldn’t prove

List only requirements that matter to the decision and that a
scripted demo, a reference call or a document can’t settle, such as
integrations, performance at your volumes, loading your real data, or
configuration by your own staff.

RFP requirement ID Requirement Why the demo didn’t prove it Tested in scenario
[INT-03] [Two-way sync of accounts and orders with [ERP]] [Shown with a simulated ERP] [TS-1]
[NFR-07] [Search and reporting speed with [number] records] [Demo held far fewer records] [TS-2]
[DM-02] [Import of our customer data without manual rework] [Not shown with data in our format] [TS-3]
[SEC-04] [Single sign-on with [identity provider]] [Shown with the vendor’s own setup] [TS-4]
[FR-21] [Our administrators configure [approval workflow] without code] [Configured by the vendor’s engineer] [TS-5]

2. Scope

2.1 Use cases in scope

  • [UC-1, e.g. A sales rep creates an account and order that flow to
    [ERP]]
  • [UC-2, e.g. A sales manager runs the pipeline report for all
    regions]
  • [UC-3, e.g. An administrator sets up the discount approval
    workflow]

2.2 In scope

  • Product: [modules and features]
  • Integrations: test connections to [test instances of systems]
    only
  • Data: the data sets in Section 5.2
  • Users: up to [number] named test users in these roles: [roles]
  • Configuration: the vendor configures [list]; our administrators
    configure [list]

2.3 Out of scope

  • Production systems and live data, unless Section 5.2 says
    otherwise
  • Full data migration beyond the samples in Section 5.2
  • Custom development, unless agreed in writing under Section 2.4
  • [Training beyond what testers need]
  • [Other exclusions]

2.4 Ground rules

  • The vendor uses the product and edition priced in its proposal.
  • If a scenario needs custom code, a third-party product or an
    unreleased feature, the vendor tells our POC lead before building it. We
    record it in the results log (Section 4.3), and it can affect the
    evaluation and the price.
  • Our testers carry out the scenario steps wherever possible. The
    vendor can guide them but doesn’t operate the product during recorded
    tests.
  • Changes to the scope, criteria or schedule need written agreement
    from both POC leads, and we make any change to a criterion or scenario
    for every finalist.

3. Success criteria

Use the same criteria for every finalist, and set every pass
threshold before the POC starts. Must: a vendor that fails it fails the
POC. Nice: it adds to the score.

ID Criterion How measured Pass threshold Priority Scenario
SC-1 Accounts and orders sync both ways with [ERP] Create and update [number] test records on each side; compare field
by field
All records match within [time]; failed records logged with a
reason
Must TS-1
SC-2 Performance at our volumes Our IT team times [search or report] over [number] runs, all test
data loaded
[Seconds] or less in at least [number] of [number] runs Must TS-2
SC-3 Our data loads without manual rework Import our masked [data set] extract; reconcile record counts [X]% load without manual correction; every reject has an error
reason
Must TS-3
SC-4 Single sign-on with [identity provider] Test users sign in through [identity provider] using [SAML 2.0 /
OpenID Connect]
Every test user signs in; a disabled user loses access within
[time]
Must TS-4
SC-5 Our administrators can configure [workflow] Our administrator builds the workflow after [hours] of vendor
training
Workflow runs end to end with no code and no vendor help Nice TS-5
SC-6 Ease of use for [role] Testers rate ease of use from 1 to 5 after their scenarios Average rating of [score] or higher Nice All
SC-7 Vendor support during the POC Response times to questions and issues in the results log First response within [number] business hours Nice All

A must-have criterion not met by the end of the retest window
(Section 7) is a fail, and a partial result counts as not met.

4. Test scenarios and results
log

4.1 How the tests run

Base each scenario on one of your hardest real processes, as you
did for the demo script.

  • Each scenario is run [once as a dry run, then once for the
    record].
  • Testers record each result in Section 4.3 on the day, with evidence
    such as screenshots, timings, logs or reconciliation reports.
  • The vendor can fix logged issues during the retest window in Section
    7. Each retest is a new row in the results log.

4.2 Scenarios

ID Scenario and steps Data used Run by Expected result Criteria
TS-1 [Create an account and order in [product]; update the account in
[ERP]; check both]
[Masked accounts, [number] records] [Sales rep, finance tester] [Changes in both systems within [time]] SC-1, SC-6
TS-2 [Run [report] and [search] [number] times each with all test data
loaded]
[Generated data, [number] records] [Our IT team] [Within the SC-2 threshold] SC-2
TS-3 [Import our [data set] extract with the standard import tools] [Masked extract, [number] records] [Our data lead] [Records load; rejects listed with reasons] SC-3
TS-4 [Sign in through [identity provider]; disable a test user and try
again]
[Test user accounts] [Our identity team] [Access granted, then removed] SC-4
TS-5 [Build [approval workflow] from our written specification] [Workflow specification] [Our administrator] [Workflow runs as specified] SC-5, SC-6

4.3 Results log

Complete this during the POC. Share a vendor’s log only with that
vendor, to confirm the facts. “How achieved” uses the RFP’s response
codes; an unreleased feature counts as not met.

Scenario Date Result How achieved Evidence Issues and follow-up
[TS-1] [Date] [Pass / Fail / Partial] [Standard / Configuration / Custom / Third party / Not met] [Screenshots, logs or reports] [Issue, owner, retest date]
[TS-2]
[TS-3]
[TS-4]
[TS-5]

5. Environment and data
handling

5.1 Test environment

Item Details
Environment [Vendor-hosted test tenant / our sandbox / test server on our
premises]
Hosting location [Country or region where our data is stored and processed]
Access [Named test users only, with single sign-on or multi-factor
authentication]
Connections to our systems [Test instances of [systems] only. No connection to production
systems.]
Access ends [Date], when the vendor disables all test accounts and
connections

5.2 Test data

Use the least data that will prove the criteria. Prefer generated
data, or real data with personal and confidential details
masked.

Data set Source Volume Personal or confidential data? Masked or generated Provided by
[Customer accounts] [Extract from [system]] [Number] records [Yes: names, contact details] [Masked: names and contact details replaced] [Us]
[Performance test data] [Generated] [Number] records [No] [Generated] [Vendor]
[Data set] [Source] [Volume] [Yes / No] [Method] [Us / Vendor]
  • Real, unmasked personal data is used only if [our data protection
    lead / security team] approves it in writing before the POC starts.
  • [Payment card data, health records or other regulated data] must not
    be used in the POC.
  • We transfer data by [secure file transfer method], not by
    email.
  • Only the vendor staff named in Section 6 can access our data.
  • Within [number] days after the POC ends, the vendor deletes our data
    from the POC environment and all copies, [including backups / with
    backups expiring within [number] days], and confirms in writing.

If real personal data is involved, ask your privacy or legal team
whether you need a data processing agreement or other terms before the
POC starts. Requirements vary by country and sector.

5.3 Security

  • Before access is granted, the vendor provides [security
    documentation, such as a SOC 2 report or ISO/IEC 27001 certificate, and
    our completed security questionnaire], and our security team approves
    the environment.
  • The vendor tells our POC lead about any security incident affecting
    the POC environment or our data within [number] hours of learning of
    it.
  • Every tester has their own account. Accounts and passwords aren’t
    shared.

5.4 Who provides what

Item Provided by Due by
Test environment and licenses for [number] test users [Vendor] [Date]
Security documentation (Section 5.3) [Vendor] [Date]
Masked data extracts (Section 5.2) [Us] [Date]
Access to test instances of [systems] [Us] [Date]
Configuration for scenarios TS-1 to TS-4 [Vendor] [Date]
Testers, for [number] hours each [Us] [Date]
Training for testers and administrators [Vendor] [Date]

6. Roles and responsibilities

Role Side Name Responsibilities
Executive sponsor Us [Name] Approves the plan; makes the go/no-go decision
POC lead Us [Name] Owns the plan and schedule; single point of contact for the vendor;
keeps the results log
Testers Us [Names] Run the scenarios; record results and evidence
IT and integration lead Us [Name] Test instances of our systems, data extracts, performance tests
Security and privacy Us [Name] Approves the environment and data handling; checks data
deletion
Evaluators Us [Names] Score the results
POC lead Vendor [Name] Vendor’s single point of contact; plans and staffs the vendor’s
work; responds to issues
Technical consultant Vendor [Name] Configures the product, sets up test connections, trains
testers

All communication about the POC, including commercial questions, goes
through the two POC leads. The contact rules in the RFP still apply.

Ask the vendor to staff the POC with people who would work on
your implementation, where possible.

7. Schedule

An example only: about a week of preparation, then three weeks
from kickoff to decision. Adjust it to your scope, allow more time if
test integrations have to be built, and give every finalist the same
length of time.

When Dates Activity Owner Output
Preparation (about one week) [Dates] Plan signed; security review; data masked; environment
requested
Both POC leads Signed plan; approved environment
Week 1 [Dates] Kickoff; environment, test users, data and test connections set up;
vendor configures the scenarios
Vendor; our IT lead Environment ready
End of week 1 [Date] Testers trained; dry run of each scenario Vendor; testers Scenarios ready
Week 2 [Dates] Scenarios run for the record; results and issues logged daily Testers Results log
Week 3, first half [Dates] Retest window: vendor fixes logged issues; testers retest Vendor; testers Final results
Week 3, second half [Dates] Scoring, findings meeting, go/no-go decision Evaluators; sponsor Scores and decision
Within [number] days after the POC [Date] Test access removed; data deletion confirmed in writing Vendor; our security lead Written confirmation

8. Costs and who pays

Whether vendors charge for a POC varies. Agree every cost below
in writing before the POC starts, and budget for your own: testers’
time, data preparation, the security review and test connections on your
side.

Cost item Paid by Amount or cap Notes
Vendor staff time: configuration, test connections, training,
support
[Vendor / Us] [Amount, or no charge] [Daily rates, if charged]
Test environment and licenses [Vendor / Us] [Amount, or no charge] Licenses end on [date]
Third-party products or connectors [Vendor / Us] [Amount] [Product]
Travel and expenses [Vendor / Us] [Cap] Only with our written approval in advance
Total charged to us [Amount, or no charge]
  • Any POC fee covers only the work in this plan, and nothing more is
    chargeable without our POC lead’s written approval.
  • [If we sign a contract for [product] by [date], the POC fee is
    credited against [first-year subscription / implementation] fees.]
  • The POC does not commit us to buy. Test licenses end on [date] and
    do not convert to a paid subscription.
  • [Configuration, scripts and documents created during the POC belong
    to [us / the vendor]. The vendor [may / may not] reuse them in an
    implementation for us.]
  • Apart from the items above, each party bears its own costs.

Public-sector buyers: check with your procurement office before
accepting a POC at no charge or paying for one, and offer every finalist
the same terms.

9. Plan sign-off

By signing, both parties agree to the scope, success criteria, test
scenarios, data handling, roles, schedule and costs in Sections 1 to 8.
This plan does not commit either party to a contract for [product].

Name Title Organization Signature Date
[Name] [Buyer POC lead] [Organization name]
[Name] [Executive sponsor or budget holder] [Organization name]
[Name] [Vendor POC lead] [Vendor name]
[Name] [Authorized signatory, if the POC is charged] [Vendor name]

Have legal review the plan before signing if the POC is charged,
uses real personal data or connects to your systems.

10. Evaluation and scoring
(internal)

Internal: delete Sections 10 to 13 from every copy you send to a
vendor.

The POC doesn’t replace the RFP evaluation. Its results update the
scores for the RFP criteria it tested, at the weights set before
proposals arrived. Before the POC starts, decide which RFP criteria each
POC criterion informs.

10.1 Scoring the POC criteria

  • Must-have criteria: Pass or Fail. A Fail at the end of the retest
    window means no-go for this vendor (Section 12).
  • Nice-to-have criteria: score each from 1 to 5 using the scale below.
    Each evaluator scores independently, then the group agrees one score and
    records the reason.
Score Meaning
5 Beat the threshold with standard functionality or configuration, and
no vendor help
4 Met the threshold with standard functionality or configuration
3 Met the threshold, but needed vendor help, a workaround or a
retest
2 Missed the threshold, or met it only with custom code or a
third-party product
1 Not met, or not attempted

Edit the definitions to suit, before the POC starts.

10.2 Updating the RFP scores

The weights shown are an example only. Use the weights from your
RFP, unchanged.

POC criteria RFP criterion they inform RFP weight Score before POC (1 to 5) Score after POC (1 to 5) Reason for any change
SC-1, SC-2, SC-4 [Technical and security] [20] [Evidence from the results log]
SC-5, SC-6 [Functional fit] [35]
SC-3, SC-7 [Implementation and support] [15]

Recalculate each finalist’s weighted total the same way you did for
the proposals. If a scenario passed only with custom work or a
third-party product, get the vendor’s written price for it and add it to
the cost comparison before you rescore cost.

11. Comparing
finalists side by side (internal)

Use this when two or three finalists take part, each with the
same plan, scenarios, data and length of time, run as close together as
you can. If your testers can’t give that time two or three times over,
test the leading one or two finalists and keep the others in the process
until you decide.

Item Priority [Vendor A] [Vendor B] [Vendor C] Notes
SC-1 to SC-4 Must [Pass / Fail for each]
All must-haves passed? [Yes / No]
SC-5 to SC-7 Nice [Score for each]
Custom work or extra cost found [Description and price]
Open issues at the end [Number and severity]
Updated RFP weighted total [Total]
Rank [1 / 2 / 3]
  • Never tell one vendor how another performed, or share its
    approach.
  • Give every vendor the same tester time and the same retest
    window.
  • Record anything that made the tests unequal, such as an outage in
    one of our test systems, and agree how to treat it before scoring.

12. Go/no-go
decision and next steps (internal)

12.1 Decision rules

Set these before the POC starts.

  • Go: every must-have criterion passed, and the
    vendor ranks first on the updated RFP weighted total.
  • Conditional go: every must-have criterion passed,
    but [named issues] remain. Go ahead only if the vendor commits in the
    contract to fix them by [date].
  • No-go: any must-have criterion failed at the end of
    the retest window, or [other condition, e.g. custom work found during
    the POC takes the total cost over budget].

12.2 Decision record

Item Details
Vendor [Vendor name: one record per finalist]
Decision [Go / Conditional go / No-go]
Date [Date]
Decided by [Name and title]
Reasons and risks found [Short summary, referring to Sections 10 and 11]
Conditions, owners and dates [Condition, owner, date]

12.3 Next steps

After a go:

  • Finish any outstanding reference checks, then negotiate. If your
    rules allow it, keep the runner-up in the process until the contract is
    signed.
  • Write what the POC proved into the contract and statement of work:
    the integration approach tested, the performance results as acceptance
    criteria, and any fixes the vendor committed to.
  • Give the delivery team this plan, the results log and the decision
    record.

After a no-go:

  • Move to the next-ranked finalist, or, if no finalist passed, revisit
    the requirements and budget with the sponsor.

In every case:

  • When you award the contract, tell every finalist the outcome, and
    offer the unsuccessful ones a debrief.
  • Get written confirmation from every vendor that test access is
    removed and your data is deleted (Section 5.2).
  • Keep the plans, results logs, scores and decisions with the
    selection file.

13. Decision sign-off
(internal)

We confirm that the results in Section 4.3 and the scores in Sections
10 and 11 are accurate, and we approve the decision in Section 12.

Name Role Signature Date
[Name] POC lead
[Name] Evaluator
[Name] Executive sponsor

Frequently asked questions

What is a proof of concept in software buying?

A proof of concept (POC) is a short, structured test of a vendor’s software that a buyer runs before choosing, to check requirements a demo can’t prove. Your own staff run agreed scenarios with your data in a test environment, and the results are judged against success criteria set in advance. For example, a team choosing a CRM might test whether each finalist’s product can keep customer accounts in sync with its ERP test system.

What should a POC document include?

The requirements the POC will test and why, the scope, success criteria with pass thresholds, test scenarios, environment and data handling rules, roles on both sides, a schedule, the costs and who pays, and sign-off. For your own team, it also needs a way to score the results and a record of the go/no-go decision. This template includes all of them, plus a results log and a side-by-side comparison of finalists.

How do you write POC success criteria?

Tie each criterion to a requirement in your RFP, and state how it will be measured, what result counts as a pass and whether it’s a must-have or nice-to-have. Replace words like “works” or “fast” with a test, a volume and a threshold. Agree the criteria with every finalist and fix them before the POC starts.

How long should a proof of concept take?

Long enough to run every scenario and retest any fixes, and no longer. The example schedule in this template runs three weeks from kickoff to decision, after about a week of preparation. Allow more time if test integrations have to be built, and agree a fixed end date in writing.

What is the difference between a POC and a pilot?

A POC tests whether specific requirements can be met, in a test environment with your data, while you’re still choosing a vendor. A pilot puts the product in front of real users doing real work, such as one team or site, to see how it performs day to day and whether to roll it out further. A pilot needs its own commercial and data protection terms.

Related guides and templates

Download Template

More procurement documents templates