Microsoft 365 Backup RFP Template (Free): Requirements
Paste-ready Microsoft 365 backup requirements (Exchange Online, OneDrive, SharePoint, Teams, Entra ID, restore, immutability, legal hold), sharp vendor questions and a scoring…
A free, vendor-neutral RFP for hiring an agency or development partner to build custom software, with user stories, delivery questions, code ownership terms, fixed-price and time-and-materials pricing tables and example scoring weights.

See the structure before you download. The Word file has every section listed below, ready to fill in.
The sections in the document, in order.
Use this request for proposal for software development when you need an outside team to build an application for you: a customer portal, a web app, an iOS or Android app, or an internal tool that no product on the market fits. It's written for the buyer, meaning the product owner, IT manager or procurement lead running the selection, including first-timers.
It's for buying development services, not software that already exists. If you're choosing a product such as a CRM or ERP system, start from the CRM RFP template, the ERP RFP template or another template in the RFP examples library. A custom software development RFP asks different questions: how the vendor will work, who will do the work, who owns the code, and how you'll pay for a scope that may change once people use working software.
The Word file is a complete RFP for software development that you can tailor and send. Every section has [bracketed] placeholders, and the requirements tables carry example user stories for a booking and field service app, so you can see the level of detail to aim for before you write your own.
Download the editable Microsoft Word version below. The full text is on this page, so you can read it before you download.
Work through the template in this order, and spend the most time on the scope and requirements, because that’s what vendors estimate from.
The pricing model decides who pays when the work changes, and on a custom build, requirements can change once people start using working software.
Under a fixed price, the vendor agrees to deliver a defined scope for a set amount, so it carries the risk that the work takes longer than estimated. That works when the requirements are settled and every deliverable can be tested. Expect the price to include contingency for unknowns, and expect anything outside the agreed scope to come back as a change request with its own price.
Under time and materials, you pay for the hours or days worked at agreed rates. You can reorder the backlog every sprint, but you carry the risk of overruns, so control it with a rate card, a not-to-exceed amount, budget reporting in every sprint and the right to stop at the end of any sprint. The statement of work template compares the two models in more detail.
This template combines them. A short discovery phase at a fixed price produces a backlog, designs, an architecture and a refined estimate. The build is then priced at a fixed price, as time and materials with a not-to-exceed amount, or both, so you can compare.
Don’t assume that paying for software makes you its owner. Ownership depends on what the contract says and on the law that applies, so agree it in writing before work starts and have legal counsel review the terms. The template’s intellectual property section sets out positions to discuss with counsel. It isn’t legal advice.
Expect three kinds of code in what a vendor delivers. Custom work is written for you, and you can ask to own it or to receive a broad license to it. Pre-existing materials are frameworks, components and tools the vendor already had and may reuse for other clients, so the vendor may keep ownership and license them to you. Open-source and third-party components belong to someone else, and come with license terms you have to follow.
Practical control matters as much as the ownership clause. Ask for the code in your own repository from the first sprint, and keep cloud, app store and third-party accounts in your name. If the vendor will own the code or a platform it runs on, consider source code escrow, where an independent agent holds a copy of the code and releases it to you if agreed events happen, such as the vendor going out of business.
You’re choosing a team as much as a company, so test the people and the way they work as well as the proposal. Follow the evaluation steps in the RFP process guide: a compliance check, independent scoring against weights set before proposals arrive, then presentations and reference calls with two or three finalists.
The template’s scoring section uses the guide’s example split, labeled as an example: functional fit 35, technical and security 20, implementation and support 15, vendor strength and references 10, and cost 20. For a development partner, functional fit means how well the vendor understands your needs and proposes to meet them, and implementation and support covers the delivery process, the team, the warranty and the handover. Change the weights to suit your project before any proposal arrives. The guide to RFP evaluation criteria and scoring explains how to build and weight criteria.
This is the complete text of the Word document. Fill in the [bracketed] placeholders and delete the italic guidance before you send it.
About this template: Use this RFP to hire a software development
company, such as an agency or development partner, to design, build,
launch and support a custom application. It isn’t for buying software
that already exists. Fill in the [square brackets], and replace the
example entries, which describe a booking and field service app, with
your own. Delete the italic instructions before you send the RFP, and
have legal counsel review Sections 9 and 15 and your draft contract
first.
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| RFP title | [Project name]: custom software development |
| RFP number | [RFP-YYYY-NNN] |
| Issued by | [Organization legal name] |
| Issue date | [Date] |
| Questions due | [Date, time and time zone] |
| Proposals due | [Date, time and time zone] |
| RFP contact | [Name, title, email] |
[Two or three sentences: who you are, what you do, where you operate
and how large you are.]
[Describe the problem the software will solve: how the work is done
today, which systems are involved, who is affected and why you’re acting
now.]
Example: Customers book service visits by phone and can’t see
when a technician will arrive, so the call center spends much of its day
answering status questions. Technicians receive job details by
email.
[Organization name] (“we”, “us”) invites proposals from software
development companies to design, build, test and launch [short
description of the application], and to support it after launch. We
intend to select one development partner (the “vendor”) through the
process in Section 14. This RFP is not an offer and does not commit us
to award a contract.
| Attachment | Description |
|---|---|
| A | Requirements workbook: the tables in Sections 4, 5 and 10, for vendors to complete |
| B | Pricing workbook: the tables in Section 12 |
| C | [Wireframes, designs or a system diagram, if you have them] |
| D | [Draft contract, such as a master services agreement and statement of work] |
| E | [Security questionnaire, if you use one] |
List the outcomes you want, in priority order. Describe results
rather than features, and say how you’ll know you’ve achieved each
one.
| No. | Objective | How we will measure it |
|---|---|---|
| O1 | [Example: Let customers book and reschedule service visits online, without calling us] |
[Example: Share of bookings made online, [target]% by [date]] |
| O2 | [Example: Show customers their technician’s arrival window, updated during the day] |
[Example: Status calls to the call center per week] |
| O3 | [Example: Launch the first release before [date or event]] | [Example: Apps live in the app stores and the web application in production] |
| O4 | [Objective] | [Measure] |
Give vendors the figures they’ll size and price against. A vendor
that has to guess will either add contingency or leave work
out.
| User type | What they do in the application | Number of users | Platforms |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Example: Customers] | [Book, reschedule and track visits; pay invoices] | [At launch, and expected in [two] years] | [Web, iOS, Android] |
| [Example: Technicians] | [See daily jobs, update job status, capture photos and signatures] |
[Number] | [iOS / Android phones] |
| [Example: Dispatchers] | [Assign jobs and manage schedules] | [Number] | [Web] |
| [Example: Administrators] | [Manage users, settings and content] | [Number] | [Web] |
| Platform | In scope | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Web application | [Yes / No] | [Responsive for desktop and mobile browsers; supported browsers] |
| iOS app | [Yes / No] | [Minimum iOS version; iPhone, iPad or both] |
| Android app | [Yes / No] | [Minimum Android version; phones, tablets or both] |
| Administration portal | [Yes / No] | [Web, for our staff only] |
| API for partners | [Yes / No] | [Who will use it, and for what] |
| System | Purpose | Data exchanged and direction | Interface available | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Example: ERP] | [Customer accounts and invoices] | [Accounts and invoices to the app; payments back to the ERP] | [REST API / file export / none / unknown] | [Team or supplier] |
| [Identity provider] | [Staff sign-in] | [Single sign-on] | [SAML 2.0 / OpenID Connect] | [IT] |
| [Payment provider] | [Card payments] | [Payment requests and results] | [API] | [Finance] |
| [Email and SMS service] | [Notifications] | [Outbound messages] | [API] | [IT] |
Splitting the work into phases lets you fix the price of what you
can define now and keep options open for the rest.
| Phase | What it covers | Pricing requested |
|---|---|---|
| 1: Discovery | [Requirements, backlog, key designs, architecture, refined estimate] |
Fixed price (Section 12.1) |
| 2: First release | [All Must-have requirements in Sections 4, 5 and 10] | [Fixed price (12.2) / time and materials with a not-to-exceed amount (12.3) / both] |
| 3: Later releases | [Nice-to-have requirements and future items] | [Rate card in 12.3 and an indicative estimate] |
| Support | Warranty, hypercare and optional ongoing support | Section 12.5 |
We may [award Phase 1 only and decide on Phase 2 after reviewing the
discovery outputs / award Phases 1 and 2 together]. Our target start
date is [date], and we need the first release live by [date, and the
reason].
Write each requirement as a user story (who needs to do what, and
why) or as a single requirement line, one need per line. Mark each one
Must-have (in the first release and in the price) or Nice-to-have
(priced as an option or planned for later). Keep the Must-have list
short. Replace the example rows with your own.
Give each requirement in Sections 4, 5 and 10 one of these codes, and
explain it in the comment column.
| Code | What it means |
|---|---|
| Included | Built as part of the priced scope |
| Vendor component | Delivered using code, a framework or a tool the vendor already owns (see Section 9.2) |
| Third party | Delivered using a third-party service or open-source component; name it, its license and any cost |
| Optional | Can be delivered but isn’t in the base price; price it in Section 12 |
| Clarify | Can’t be estimated without more information; state your question or assumption |
| Not proposed | Not included; explain why |
Product RFPs use codes such as standard, configuration and
roadmap, because they ask about a product the vendor already sells.
These codes show instead how each requirement will be built, who owns
that part and whether it’s in the price.
| ID | User story or requirement | Priority | Response code | Vendor comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR-01 | [Example: As a customer, I want to create an account with my email address [or sign in with Apple or Google], so that I can manage my bookings.] |
[Must-have] | ||
| FR-02 | [Example: As a customer, I want to book a visit by choosing a service, my address and an available time slot, so that I don’t have to call.] |
[Must-have] | ||
| FR-03 | [Example: As a customer, I want to reschedule or cancel a visit up to [24] hours before it starts, so that I can fit it around my plans.] |
[Must-have] | ||
| FR-04 | [Example: As a technician, I want to see my jobs for the day and update each job’s status, including when I have no signal, so that dispatch knows where I am.] |
[Must-have] | ||
| FR-05 | [Example: As a dispatcher, I want to assign and reassign jobs on a calendar by technician, so that I can respond to changes during the day.] |
[Must-have] | ||
| FR-06 | [Example: As an administrator, I want to manage users and roles without a developer, so that we can onboard staff ourselves.] |
[Must-have] | ||
| FR-07 | [Example: As a customer, I want to pay an invoice by card in the app, so that I don’t have to phone with my card details.] |
[Nice-to-have] | ||
| FR-08 | [Requirement] | [Priority] |
Add acceptance criteria to the stories that carry the most cost
or risk. They tell vendors what “done” means, and they become the tests
you’ll use to accept the work.
Example for FR-03:
The bracketed values are placeholders, not recommendations. Set
targets that fit your users and budget, because each one affects the
price.
| ID | Requirement | Priority | Response code | Vendor comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NF-01 | Performance: [screens load / API calls respond] within [time] for [percentage]% of requests at [number] concurrent users, and capacity for [growth figures] within [two] years. Describe how you’ll test this before launch. |
[Must-have] | ||
| NF-02 | Availability: [target]% in production, measured monthly, excluding maintenance announced [notice period] in advance. Describe what your design and the hosting need to meet it. |
[Must-have] | ||
| NF-03 | Backup and recovery: a recovery point objective (RPO) of [time] and a recovery time objective (RTO) of [time], with a restore test before launch. |
[Must-have] | ||
| NF-04 | Accessibility: the web application and mobile apps conform to WCAG [2.1 / 2.2] Level [A / AA]. Describe how you’ll test and what evidence you’ll deliver. |
[Must-have] | ||
| NF-05 | Devices and browsers: [browsers and versions], iOS [version] and later, Android [version] and later. |
[Must-have] | ||
| NF-06 | Offline use: [the technician app works without a connection for [tasks] and syncs when the connection returns]. |
[Priority] | ||
| NF-07 | Monitoring: application logs, error tracking, uptime monitoring and alerts to [team or tool], in place before launch. |
[Must-have] | ||
| NF-08 | Maintainability: code follows documented standards, has automated tests for [agreed critical paths], and can be built and deployed by another competent team using the documentation and pipelines you deliver. |
[Must-have] | ||
| NF-09 | Privacy: the application collects only the personal data its features need, and supports our obligations under [laws that apply], including access and deletion requests. |
[Must-have] |
Public bodies: check whether a law or policy sets the
accessibility standard you must meet, and use that version and
level.
Separate firm constraints from preferences. A preferred stack
helps if your own team will maintain the code, but don’t rule out a
better proposal by prescribing technology you don’t need to.
| Area | Our standard or preference | Firm or preference |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | [Our [cloud provider] account / vendor-hosted / on-premises] | [Firm / Preference] |
| Hosting region | [Where production data must be hosted] | [Firm / Preference] |
| Languages and frameworks | [Preferred stack, if any] | [Firm / Preference] |
| Database | [Preferred database, if any] | [Firm / Preference] |
| Mobile approach | [Native / cross-platform / no preference] | [Firm / Preference] |
| Identity | [Identity provider for staff; approach for customer accounts] | [Firm / Preference] |
| Source control and CI/CD | [Our organization in [code hosting platform]] | [Firm / Preference] |
In your proposal:
Answer each question in no more than [300] words.
Our minimum definition of done. A user story is done only when:
Ask for the people who will do the work. Vendors can add
rows.
| Role | Name | Location (city, country) | Employee or subcontractor | Time on project (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delivery or project manager | ||||
| Business analyst | ||||
| Technical lead or architect | ||||
| UX and UI designer | ||||
| Developers (one row each) | ||||
| QA or test engineers | ||||
| DevOps or cloud engineer |
Attach a short résumé for each named person, covering similar
projects and the technologies you propose.
Agree your position with legal counsel before you issue the RFP,
and put the final terms in the contract. Who owns software depends on
what the contract says and on the law that applies, so don’t assume that
paying for development makes you the owner. This template isn’t legal
advice.
Confirm that you accept each position below, or list your exceptions
in Section 16.
[Option A: We will own the source code, designs, documentation and
other materials created for us under the contract (the “custom work”)
from [creation / payment], and you will sign any documents needed to
confirm that.]
[Option B: You will own the custom work and grant us a [perpetual,
irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free] license to use, copy, modify and
maintain it, and to have other suppliers do so for us. [State whether
the license is exclusive, and whether you may reuse the custom work for
other clients.]]
Keep one option. Option A suits software that’s core to your
business, or that your own team or another supplier will maintain. A
vendor may price Option B lower if it can reuse the work.
List any code, frameworks or tools you already own and plan to
include in the software (“pre-existing materials”). You keep ownership
of them, and grant us a [perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free,
non-exclusive] license to use, modify and maintain them as part of the
software, and to have other suppliers do so for us, including after the
contract ends. [Deliver them as source code.]
Some open-source licenses attach conditions, such as making
source code available, when you distribute software that includes the
component or, under some licenses, when users interact with a modified
version over a network. Have counsel review the license list against how
you’ll use and distribute the software.
Keep this only if the vendor will own the code or a platform it
depends on, or will host the software. If all the code is in your
repository (9.3), you may not need escrow.
[State whether you will deposit the source code and build
instructions with an independent escrow agent, how often deposits are
updated and verified, the events that release the code to us (for
example insolvency or the end of support), and who pays the escrow
fees.]
State whether your team uses AI coding assistants, which ones and
under what controls. Confirm that code produced with them is covered by
the terms above and reviewed and tested like any other code, and that
our code and data won’t be used to train AI models.
If you have a security questionnaire, attach it, and keep this
table for the points you’ll score.
| ID | Requirement | Priority | Response code | Vendor comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC-01 | Secure development practices based on a recognized framework, such as [the NIST Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF)], with security requirements checked against [the OWASP Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS) and, for mobile apps, the OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard (MASVS)]. Describe your threat modeling. |
[Must-have] | ||
| SEC-02 | Static code analysis, dependency scanning and secrets scanning in the pipeline, with findings fixed before release according to severity. |
[Must-have] | ||
| SEC-03 | An independent penetration test of the web application, APIs and mobile apps before launch, with critical and high findings fixed and retested before go-live. State whether it’s in your price. |
[Must-have] | ||
| SEC-04 | Single sign-on for staff via [identity provider] using SAML 2.0 or OpenID Connect, multi-factor authentication for administrators, and secure sign-in for customers. |
[Must-have] | ||
| SEC-05 | Role-based access control enforced on the server for every request, and an audit log of sign-ins, permission changes and changes to [key records]. |
[Must-have] | ||
| SEC-06 | Encryption in transit and at rest, with secrets kept in a managed secrets store, never in code. |
[Must-have] | ||
| SEC-07 | Your staff’s access to our systems uses accounts we issue, follows least privilege and is removed within [time] when someone leaves the project. No production personal data in development or test environments unless it is masked or we approve it in writing. |
[Must-have] | ||
| SEC-08 | A data processing agreement where you process personal data for us, a list of any sub-processors, and data stored and processed only in [regions]. |
[Must-have] | ||
| SEC-09 | Notification of any security incident affecting our code, systems or data within [time] of discovery. |
[Must-have] | ||
| SEC-10 | Evidence of your own security: [a current SOC 2 Type II report or ISO/IEC 27001 certification, if you hold one, or your security policies], and how you protect developer devices and source code. |
[Must-have] |
| Severity | Definition | Response target | Fix or workaround target |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1: Critical | [Production down, data loss or a security breach, with no workaround] |
[Time] | [Time] |
| 2: High | [A key function fails for many users, with no reasonable workaround] |
[Time] | [Time] |
| 3: Medium | [A function fails, but a workaround exists] | [Time] | [Time] |
| 4: Low | [A cosmetic issue or minor inconvenience] | [Time] | [Next planned release] |
State the hours of cover for each severity, for example business
hours, or around the clock for Severity 1.
Propose support after the warranty period, priced in Section 12.5.
Cover defect fixes against the targets in 11.2, security patches and
dependency updates, updates for new iOS, Android and browser versions,
hours for small enhancements, and handover to us or another supplier
when support ends.
Delete the tables you don’t need before you issue the RFP.
Keeping both 12.2 and 12.3 for the build shows you how each vendor
prices risk, not just effort.
Sharing a budget range stops vendors proposing something you
can’t afford; holding it back keeps prices from clustering just under
your number. Public bodies: check whether your rules cover disclosing an
estimate.
| Deliverable | Description | Duration (weeks) | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery outputs | [Prioritized backlog, user journeys, key designs, solution architecture, test approach] |
||
| Refined Phase 2 estimate | [Estimate by feature area, with assumptions, a fixed price or a not-to-exceed amount] |
||
| Total |
Link each payment to a milestone that’s met only when its
deliverables are accepted. A holdback released at final acceptance gives
the vendor a reason to finish well: fill in the holdback percentages
before you issue the RFP, or delete that column.
| Milestone | Deliverables | Target date | Price | Holdback (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1 | [Example: Sign-in, booking and rescheduling in the test environment] |
|||
| M2 | [Example: Technician app and dispatcher calendar in the test environment] |
|||
| M3 | [Example: All Must-have stories pass user acceptance testing] | |||
| M4 | [Example: App store approval and production launch] | |||
| M5 | [Final acceptance after [number] days in production with no open Severity 1 or 2 defects] |
|||
| Total |
State what the fixed price includes, such as the number of design
rounds, and how you’ll price changes.
| Role | Location | Rate per [hour / day] | Estimated [hours / days] | Estimated cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delivery or project manager | ||||
| Business analyst | ||||
| Technical lead or architect | ||||
| UX and UI designer | ||||
| Developer: [web / back end / mobile] | ||||
| QA or test engineer | ||||
| DevOps or cloud engineer | ||||
| Total estimate |
| Item | Response |
|---|---|
| Not-to-exceed amount for Phase 2 | |
| Written notice before charges reach [percentage]% of the not-to-exceed amount |
[Confirm] |
| Rates fixed until, and maximum annual increase after that | |
| Billing basis | [Approved timesheets, invoiced monthly in arrears] |
Under time and materials you pay for the time worked, so ask for
budget used in every sprint report, approve timesheets, and keep the
right to reprioritize or stop work at the end of any sprint.
| Cost item | One-time | Per year | Paid to | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Third-party licenses and services | [List each] | |||
| Hosting in production (estimate at the volumes in 3.4) | ||||
| Penetration test, if not included above | ||||
| Travel and expenses | [Only with our prior written approval] | |||
| Any other cost, listed by the vendor |
| Option | What’s included | Hours per month | Monthly price | Rate for extra hours |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Basic: defect fixes and security updates] | ||||
| [Standard: Basic plus monitoring and enhancement hours] | ||||
| [Vendor’s proposed option] |
State the minimum term and notice period for each option.
These questions show how the vendor works. Keep the ones that
would change a score.
Answer each question in no more than [300] words.
Set the criteria and weights before any proposal arrives, and
don’t change them afterwards. Public bodies: your rules may require you
to publish the criteria and their relative importance, so check with
your procurement office.
These weights are an example only. Adjust them to your priorities
before you issue the RFP: if your own team will maintain the code, for
example, you might move weight toward technical quality and
handover.
| Criterion | Weight (example) | What a strong response shows |
|---|---|---|
| Functional fit: understanding of our needs and the proposed solution |
35 | A clear grasp of our objectives and users, a sensible first release and a credible approach to every Must-have |
| Technical and security | 20 | An architecture that fits our requirements and team, with security, testing and accessibility built in from the start |
| Implementation and support: delivery approach, team, warranty and handover |
15 | Demos every sprint, honest reporting, an experienced named team, and a clear warranty, support and handover plan |
| Vendor strength and references | 10 | Similar projects delivered, references that confirm it, and a company able to support us after launch |
| Cost | 20 | The total cost to build and run the software, with clear assumptions and, for time and materials, a not-to-exceed amount |
| Total | 100 |
To compare a fixed-price bid with a time-and-materials bid, use
the same scope: compare the fixed price with the not-to-exceed amount,
and read the assumptions behind each. A fixed price with long
exclusions, or a low estimate with a high not-to-exceed amount, can cost
more in the end.
Weighted score for each criterion = score × weight ÷ 100. Because the
weights total 100, the highest possible total is 5.00.
Decide how you’ll turn prices into a cost score before proposals
arrive, and use the same method for every vendor. The RFP evaluation
criteria guide compares the common methods.
An example schedule. For a mid-sized software RFP, a response
window of three to four weeks is a workable example; allow more if you
want detailed estimates.
| Step | Date |
|---|---|
| RFP issued | [Date] |
| Questions due | [Date, time and time zone] |
| Answers sent to all vendors | [Date] |
| Proposals due | [Date, time and time zone] |
| Shortlisted vendors notified | [Date] |
| Presentations and reference checks | [Dates] |
| Selection, and all vendors notified | [Date] |
| Contract signed and Phase 1 starts | [Date] |
Have your legal or procurement team confirm these terms before
you issue the RFP.
List any exception to the requirements, Section 9, Section 15.4 or
the draft contract, with the wording you propose instead. Write “None”
if you have no exceptions.
| Section | Exception | Proposed alternative |
|---|---|---|
By signing, I confirm that I am authorized to submit this proposal on
behalf of the vendor named below, that the people named in Section 8
will work on the project if we are selected, and that the information in
this proposal is accurate.
| Item | Response |
|---|---|
| Vendor legal name | |
| Name and title | |
| Signature | |
| Date |
Background and objectives, a scope covering users, platforms, integrations and data, functional requirements written as user stories, and non-functional requirements such as performance, security and accessibility. It should also ask how the vendor will deliver the work, who is on the team and who will own the code, and include a pricing table, vendor questions, evaluation criteria and weights, and submission instructions. This template includes all of them.
Yes. The scope section lets you mark the web application, iOS app and Android app in or out of scope, and the requirements cover device support, offline use and app store submission. If you only need a mobile app, delete the web rows and ask vendors to recommend native or cross-platform development and explain the trade-offs.
It depends on how settled your requirements are. A fixed price gives cost certainty for a defined scope but turns changes into priced change requests, while time and materials lets you change priorities as you go but leaves the risk of overruns with you. A middle path is a fixed-price discovery phase followed by a build priced either way, which is how this template is set up.
It depends on the contract and the law that applies, so don’t assume that paying for the work makes you the owner. Decide whether you need to own the custom code or whether a broad license is enough, find out which parts the vendor already owns, and have legal counsel review the terms before you sign. Whatever you agree, ask for the code in your own repository from the start.
Enough for real competition, and few enough that your team can score every proposal properly. A shortlist of three to five is a workable size for a software RFP, narrowing to two or three finalists after scoring. Public-sector buyers may have to advertise openly, in which case any eligible company can respond.
Paste-ready Microsoft 365 backup requirements (Exchange Online, OneDrive, SharePoint, Teams, Entra ID, restore, immutability, legal hold), sharp vendor questions and a scoring…
Paste-ready Kubernetes backup requirements (application-consistent backup, CSI snapshots, cross-cluster restore, immutability, RBAC, GitOps), sharp vendor questions and a weighted scoring rubric.
Outlines requirements for selecting a Blockchain as a Service provider capable of delivering a comprehensive cloud-based solution.
Please provide your feedback below.
"*" indicates required fields